Corruption offenses by administrative legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan

The legal regulation of public relations related to the commission of offenses of corruption, placed in Chapter 34 of the Administrative Code of the

Republic of Kazakhstan entitled " Administrative corruption offenses".

The administrative corruption offenses in accordance with the Administrative Code include:

- Providing illegal material reward individuals (st.676);

- Obtaining illegal material reward a person authorized to perform public functions or an equivalent person (st.677);

- Providing illegal consideration legal entities (st.678);

- The implementation of illegal business activities and receipt of illicit income state agencies and local governments (st.679);

- Failure to heads of state bodies in the fight against corruption (st.680);

- The employment of persons who committed corruption crimes (st.681).

Thus, the Administrative Code provides 6 articles containing anti-corruption provisions.

The peculiarity of administrative relations is the fact that as one of the parties is always the subject of administrative power. The other side may be all different actors - public authorities, institutions, organizations and citizens.

Under the provision of illegal material rewards (st.676 CAO) is providing individuals persons authorized to perform public functions or persons equated to them, illegal consideration, gifts, benefits or services if these actions do not contain signs of criminal offenses for.

For the commission of the act provided for an administrative penalty of a fine of two hundred MCI.

Administrative fine - a monetary penalty imposed on behalf of the State or on behalf of an administrative offense in the cases and within the limits prescribed by law. The fine is the most common and effective form of exposure to the material interests of the offender.

In close connection with the review of administrative corruption offenses is to obtain unlawful material reward a person authorized to Satisfaction of public functions or an equivalent person (st.677 CAO). The logic is that the remuneration provided by someone is addressed, that is, it can be obtained by someone (not including abandonment of the illegal remuneration).

Actions envisaged st.677 CAO, is to get a person authorized to perform public functions or an equivalent person, personally or through an intermediary illegal consideration, gifts, benefits or services for the actions (inaction) in favor of individuals, provide them if such actions (inaction) are included into service powers of the person authorized to perform public functions or an equivalent person, if these actions do not contain signs of a criminal offense.

For the commission of the offense provided for an

administrative penalty of a fine in the amount of six

hundred MCI.

If st.676 CAO regulated provision of illegal material reward individuals in st.678 CAO talking about the same acts committed by legal entities.

Under the provision of illegal consideration legal entities (st.678 CAO) is providing legal persons to persons authorized to perform public functions or persons equated to them, illegal consideration, gifts, benefits or services, if these actions do not contain evidence of criminal offense.

This offense has aggravating circumstances set forth in the second part of st.678 CAO.

For the commission of the offense provided for administrative penalties:

- On the first part - a fine of seven hundred and fifty MCI;

- On the second part (if the action committed repeatedly within a year after an administrative penalty naolozheniya) - a fine of five hundred thousand MCI.

Under the implementation of illegal business activities and receipt of illicit income state agencies and local governments (st.679 CAO) is meant activity by state bodies, local government business activities outside of their assigned functions legislation or the adoption of wealth and benefits, in addition to established sources of financing.

For the commission of the offense provided for an administrative penalty of a fine in the amount of six hundred MCI.

Under inaction heads of state bodies to combat corruption (st.680 CAO) means any failure of the leaders of the responsible secretary or other officials determined by the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, government agencies, the armed forces of the Republic of Kazakhstan, other troops and military formations of the Republic of Kazakhstan within its authority measures against subordinate perpetrators of corruption offenses, or the adoption of such measures in violation of the legislation on the fight against corruption, or failure to the relevant information to the authorities of the State Revenue residence perpetrators.

For the commission of the offense provided a measure of administrative penalty of a fine of one hundred MCI.

By taking on the work of the persons who committed corruption crimes (st.681 CAO) means that the heads of state bodies, institutions and enterprises, or heads of national companies, national managing holdings, national development institutions, as well as their affiliated organizations to employ persons previously committed the crime of corruption.

For the commission of the offense provided for an administrative penalty of a fine of one hundred MCI.

Thus, for the commission of any corruption offense provided in the rules of the Administrative Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, established the only measure of an administrative penalty - a fine.