Unit 14. William Hogarth

Part 1

I 1.Study the words.

felicity – дар, способность, счастье

jaded – измученный, заезженный

verve – живость, яркость, талант

clandestine – тайный, скрытый

congenial – подходящий, благоприятный

sharp-wittedness – остроумие, проницательность

insular – островной, относящийся к Британским островам

veneration – почитание, преклонение

varnish – лак, олифа

curvature – изгиб

II 1.Read the text. Some of the sentences have been removed from it. Fill in the blank spaces with the sentences below.

a)Yet he was not content with one line of development only and the work of his mature years takes a varied course.

b)With many felicities of detail and arrangement they show Hogarth still in a restrained and decorous mood.

c)There is no reason to suppose he had anything but respect for the great Italian masters, though he deliberately took a provocative attitude.

d)His first success as a painter was in the " conversation pieces" in which his bent as an artist found a logical beginning.

e)It was his achievement to give a comprehensive view of social life within the framework of moralistic and dramatic narrative.

f)The fact that he was apprenticed as a boy to a silver-plate engraver has a considerable bearing on Hogarth’s development.

g)In portraiture he displays a great variety.

William Hogarth (1697–1764)

William Hogarth was unquestionably one of the greatest of English artists and a man of remarkably individual character and thought. (1) He produced portraits which brought a fresh vitality and truth into the jaded profession of what he called “phizmongering”. He observed both high life and low with a keen and critical eye and his range of observation was accompanied by an exceptional capacity for dramatic composition, and in painting by a technical quality which adds beauty to pictures containing an element of satire or caricature.

A small stocky man with blunt pugnacious features and alert blue eyes, he had all the sharp-wittedness of the born Cockney and an insular pride which led to his vigorous attacks on the exaggerated respect for foreign artists and the taste of would-be connoisseurs who brought over (as he said) “shiploads of dead Christs, Madonnas and Holy Families” by inferior hands. (2) What he objected to as much as anything was the absurd veneration of the darkness produced by time and varnish as well as the assumption that English painters were necessarily inferior to others. A forthrightness of statement may perhaps be related to his North-country inheritance, for his father came to London from Westmorland, but was in any case the expression of a democratic outlook and unswervingly honest intelligence.

(3) It instilled a decorative sense which is never absent from his most realistic productions. It introduced him to the world of prints, after famous masters or by the satirical commentators of an earlier day. It is the engraver’s sense of line coupled with a regard for the value of Rococo curvature which governs his essay on aesthetics, The Analysis of Beauty.

As a painter Hogarth may be assumed to have learned the craft in Thornhill’s “academy”, though his freshness of colour and feeling for the creamy substance of oil paint suggest more acquaintance than he admitted to with the technique of his French contemporaries. (4) These informal groups of family and friends surrounded by the customary necessaries of their day-to-day life were congenial in permitting him to treat a picture as a stage. He was not the inventor of the genre, which can be traced back to Dutch and Flemish art of the seventeenth century and in which he had contemporary rivals. Many were produced when he was about thirty and soon after he made his clandestine match with Thornhill’s daughter in 1729, when extra efforts to gain a livelihood became necessary. (5) A step nearer to the comprehensive view of life was the picture of an actual stage, the scene from The Beggar’s Opera with which he scored a great success about 1730, making several versions of the painting. Two prospects must have been revealed to him as a result, the idea of constructing his own pictorial drama comprising various scenes of social life, and that of reaching a wider public through the means of engraving. The first successful series The Harlot’s Progress, of which only the engraving now exist, was immediately followed by the tremendous verve and riot of The Rake’s Progress, c. 1732; the masterpiece of the story series the Marriage a la Mode followed after an interval of twelve years.

As a painter of social life, Hogarth shows the benefit of the system of memory training which he made a self-discipline. London was his universe and he displayed his mastery in painting every aspect of its people and architecture, from the mansion in Arlington Street, the interior of which provided the setting for the disillusioned couple in the second scene of the Marriage a la Mode, to the dreadful aspect of Bedlam. (6) He could not resist the temptation to attempt a rivalry with the history painters, though with little success. The Biblical compositions for St. Bartholomew’s Hospital on which he embarked after The Rake’s Progress were not of a kind to convey his real genius. He is sometimes satirical as in The March of the Guards towards Scotland, and the Oh the Roast Beef of Old England! (Calais Gate), which was a product of his single expedition abroad with its John Bull comment on the condition of France, and also the Election series of 1755 with its richness of comedy. (7) The charm of childhood, the ability to compose a vivid group, a delightful delicacy of colour appear in the Graham Children of 1742. The portrait heads of his servants are penetrating studies of character. The painting of Captain Coram, the philanthropic sea captain who took a leading part in the foundation of the Foundling Hospital, adapts the formality of the ceremonial portrait to a democratic level with a singularly engaging effects. The quality of Hogarth as an artist is seen to advantage in his sketches and one sketch in particular, the famous Shrimp Girl quickly executed with a limited range of colour, stands alone in his work, taking its place among the masterpieces of the world in its harmony of form and content, its freshness and vitality.

The genius of Hogarth is such that he is often regarded as a solitary rebel against a decaying artificiality, and yet though he had no pupils, he had contemporaries who,

while of lesser stature in one way and another, tended in the same direction.

(William Gaunt. A Concise History of English Painting)

2.Answer the questions.

1)What is peculiar of Hogart’s manner of painting?

2)What was his attitude to foreign artists?

3)What pictures and series of pictures are mentioned in the text? Give their brief description.

3.Explain what the word " phizmongering" means.

4.Which of these words go together? Recall the situations from the text in which these phrases were used.

5.Match the adjectives and their translation. What nouns can be used with them?

6.Match the words to make up phrases as they were used in the text. Think of your own examples.

Part 2

I 1.Match the words and their synonyms. Which of these words are formal?

2.Have you ever heard the following names - Andromeda, Judith and Holofernes? Who do they refer to?

II 1.Read the text.