Студопедия

Главная страница Случайная страница

КАТЕГОРИИ:

АвтомобилиАстрономияБиологияГеографияДом и садДругие языкиДругоеИнформатикаИсторияКультураЛитератураЛогикаМатематикаМедицинаМеталлургияМеханикаОбразованиеОхрана трудаПедагогикаПолитикаПравоПсихологияРелигияРиторикаСоциологияСпортСтроительствоТехнологияТуризмФизикаФилософияФинансыХимияЧерчениеЭкологияЭкономикаЭлектроника






The English adjective. The problem of analytical forms of comparison.






Usually we differentiate between synthetic and analytical forms of degrees of comparison. But scientists are not unanimous(единогласны)) whether to treat the latter as analytical grammatical forms or free word combinations Those linguists, who claim that more / most + Adj combinations are free lexical units which denote degree of quality, prove this with the help of the following arguments:

1) the adverbs more, most hold their lexical meaning;

2) lexically more / most + Adj are opposed to the combinations with less / least which are free combinations of words possessing the meaning of decrease in degree of quality;

3) the synthetic forms of comparison do not have forms with the identical markers -er, -est and with the opposite meaning;

4) word combinations with more, most can also denote a high degree of quality, e. g. a most important point.

5) between the members of the more / most + Adj combinations there exist syntagmatic relations((линейные логические отношения между словами) impossible with the members of analytical grammatical forms.

Here are some arguments in favour of treating more / most + Adj as analytical forms:

1) word combinations of the type more / most + Adj do not differ from synthetic degrees of comparison like bigger, biggest in their meaning; so more and most are identical with -er, -est as grammatical markers of the category of degrees of comparison;

2) the lexical meaning of qualitative adjectives of the difficult- or beautiful- type demands that they should have the category of degrees of comparison as far as they denote gradable qualities;

3) one and the same lexical meaning is present in all the three forms of degrees of comparison;

4) etymologically the suffix -most (which is present in some modern words such as utmost, innermost, etc.) is a combination of two elements. The first part – the suffix m-, is typical of the words of Latin origin like primus, optimus. It existed even in Old English and became a basis for the appearance of the homonymous word morpheme with the same meaning to build up analytical forms of comparison.

As for the structures of the type less / least + Adj there are also scholars who deny their grammatical character. B.S. Khaimovich, B.I. Rogovskaya put forward the following arguments:

1) less and -er have different, even opposite meanings;

2) one and the same word can attach both less and -er, so their distribution is not complementary: prettier – less pretty;

3) less is systematically substituted by not so which is not the case with more.

Some scholars admit the grammatical status of less / least + Adj combinations. To prove this L.I. Baisara refers to the following facts:

1) less / least are used with certain groups of words: adjectives and adverbs;

2) the functional word is often detached from the notional one:

e. g. less readily available;

3) more and less can go together in one and the same sentence where they mark the comparative degree of one word;

4) they have similar left-hand combinability with intensifiers.

Regarding less / least + Adj combinations as analytical grammatical forms Y. Blokh calls them forms of " reverse comparison(противоположное сравнение)" and claims that the paradigm of degrees of comparison consists not of three but five different forms:

e. g. the least beautiful – less beautiful – beautiful – more beautiful – the most beautiful.


Поделиться с друзьями:

mylektsii.su - Мои Лекции - 2015-2024 год. (0.011 сек.)Все материалы представленные на сайте исключительно с целью ознакомления читателями и не преследуют коммерческих целей или нарушение авторских прав Пожаловаться на материал