Ãëàâíàÿ ñòðàíèöà Ñëó÷àéíàÿ ñòðàíèöà ÊÀÒÅÃÎÐÈÈ: ÀâòîìîáèëèÀñòðîíîìèÿÁèîëîãèÿÃåîãðàôèÿÄîì è ñàäÄðóãèå ÿçûêèÄðóãîåÈíôîðìàòèêàÈñòîðèÿÊóëüòóðàËèòåðàòóðàËîãèêàÌàòåìàòèêàÌåäèöèíàÌåòàëëóðãèÿÌåõàíèêàÎáðàçîâàíèåÎõðàíà òðóäàÏåäàãîãèêàÏîëèòèêàÏðàâîÏñèõîëîãèÿÐåëèãèÿÐèòîðèêàÑîöèîëîãèÿÑïîðòÑòðîèòåëüñòâîÒåõíîëîãèÿÒóðèçìÔèçèêàÔèëîñîôèÿÔèíàíñûÕèìèÿ×åð÷åíèåÝêîëîãèÿÝêîíîìèêàÝëåêòðîíèêà |
St Luke’s Innovative Resources
Social Pedagogy (“...Social What?! ”) By Caitlyn Lehmann, SOON Editor, St Luke’s Innovative Resources Every so often, we like to gaze out from the crow’s nest of the Good Ship Innovative Resources to ponder the future directions of human service work and education. One recent muse upon the briny brought to our attention the growing interest in social pedagogy. In the UK, official and public concerns about the failures of the children’s welfare system have prompted authorities to take a fresh look at alternative approaches. Social pedagogy, already well-established throughout Europe, has been one of these, attracting UK practitioners with its holistic model of care. In the last handful of years, the first specialist degrees in social pedagogy have been launched by universities there— and where Britain goes, so, too, often enough, Australia follows. So let’s spin the wheel hard to starboard and a take a closer look at this not-so-new approach. What is this rather awkward-sounding ‘Social Pedagogy’? Well, it is often described as ‘education in the broadest sense.’ It’s an approach that stresses the upbringing of children as the shared responsibility of parents and society, and recognises that children’s care requires something more than simply meeting children’s biological and psychological needs. You might say it’s about offering children quality of life, rather than just the bare essentials needed to get by in our society. In English, of course, ‘pedagogy’ is usually— narrowly—defined as the ‘science of teaching and learning’. Ask the experts, and they’ll tell you that social pedagogy is problematic precisely because, as a concept, it doesn’t translate neatly into English. Being a ‘social pedagogue’ is somewhere between being a child’s teacher and carer. It’s the person who takes responsibility for supporting a child’s overall development, and who does so by building a meaningful relationship with the child and valuing the contributions of family members, other professionals and the wider community. Partly because of this, social pedagogy has often been regarded as a model best suited to the care of children in residential settings. Here in Australia, the approach has sometimes been dismissed because of our alternative emphasis on foster care. These days, however, a growing pool of research is highlighting social pedagogy’s relevance and benefits to both forms of care. Indeed, with its stress on relationships, inclusiveness, and entwined care and education, social pedagogy has its attractions for professionals across a broad range of disciplines. For teachers in our schools, who face daily conflicts between their roles as carers and educators of children, social pedagogy not only recognises, but values, the essential contribution teachers make to the ‘bringing up’ of children. In an era when the scale of public education is trending ever upwards— with massed classes of 100+ students—the principles of social pedagogy may be seen to support teachers calling for the reform of our ‘crowd control’ classrooms. The approach restores emphasis to the significant relationships teachers build with children and the importance of listening and communicating with children as individuals, as well as in groups. Right here at St Luke’s Innovative Resources, we can’t help noticing the parallels between the principles of social pedagogy and those of the strengths-based approach that underpins our publishing. Both recognise that children and staff inhabit the same ‘lifespace’ rather than separate hierarchical domains. As we might say in strengths-based parlance, the emphasis is on ‘power with’ rather than ‘power over’. There are also striking similarities between the role of the social pedagogue and the role of the adult supporter described in our admired publication by Ben Furman, Kids Skills—but then perhaps that’s not a surprise: just like social pedagogy, the Kids’ Skills method hails from Europe (Finland to be precise!). So, will we soon hear the phase ‘social pedagogy’ bandied around staffrooms and board meetings? Will we hear people debating the pronunciation of ‘pedagogy’ with a hard or soft ‘g’? (Our dictionary says either is fine.) Just possibly maybe. And if does happen, you’ll find our resources, like Change by Design and Name the Frame, ideal for helping your organisation deal with the necessary changes to policy and practice. You’ll also find our card sets, from the bubbly Wonderful You to the ever-popular Strength Cards, absolutely perfect for any activity in which the priorities of care and education come together.
|