Assignments. I. Suggest the Russian equivalents

I. Suggest the Russian equivalents

an intermediate system has developed; to supply essential items; the government controls a share of the output

II. Replace the parts in italics by synonyms

significant faults; a range of products; whilst others are used in response to the demands of consumers

III. Fill in the gaps with the words and expressions from the text

1. Command and market economies both have __.

2. __ contains elements of both market and planned economies.

3. __ we have a command economy, which does not __, __ we have a free market, where individuals __ without __.

4. Some countries are __ to command economies, while others are __ to free market economies.

5. It is just __ between market and planned element that __ in all the economies of the world.

6. The aim of mixed economies is __ the disadvantages of both systems while __ the benefits that they both offer.

7. In a mixed economy the government and the private sector __ in ___.

8. The state controls __ through __, and __, and intervenes to supply

9. The Conservative government switched many state-owned businesses to being privately owned as part of its __.

IV. Find in the text English equivalents for the following

избегать недостатков; частный сектор; налогообложение; централизо­ванно принимать экономические решения; на одном полюсе – на дру­гом...; без ограничений; взаимодействовать в решении проблем; пользо­ваться благами; правительство, возглавляемое...

V. Increase your vocabulary

to enjoy (syn. — to have as an advantage — иметь, пользоваться)

to enjoy a boom

to enjoy a high standard of living

to enjoy a basic standard of living

to enjoy the benefits

Make some sentences of your own with the above expressions.

Translate:

1. Иметь хорошее здоровье.

2. Все граждане государства должны иметь равные права.

3. Эта пьеса очень популярна.

VI. Check your grammar

It is (was)... that (who) – именно

It is the Intention of the planners that there should be enough goods and services for all.

It is these disadvantages that have led to many countries abandoning planned economies.

It is consumers who decide what is to be produced.

It is just the balance between market and planned elements that alters.

Rewrite the following sentences using the emphatic construction

1. Television was invented in this century.

1. Mathematicians have solved complicated problems with the help of computers.

3. I first saw this play on TV.

4. Two doctors made this discovery.

5. Owing to the rain we couldn't come.

VII. Answer the questions

1. Are there really pure examples of planned and market economies in the world?

2. What's a mixed economy? What's its aim?

3. What type of economy is the UK? is Russia now?

VIII. Translate into English using all the active possible

1. В реальной действительности экономические системы располагают­ся где-то между чисто рыночной и плановой экономикой.

2. Смешанная экономика — это система, при которой частная собствен­ность и рынок, а также правительство и общественные институты, энергич­но участвующие в обеспечении экономической стабильности и перераспре­делении доходов, взаимодействуют в решении экономических проблем.

MARKETS (рынки)

The Role of Market (Роль рынка)

Reports in the press tend to say " the market did this" or " the market expected good news on the economic front", as if the market were a single living entity with a single conscious mind. This is not, of course, the case. To understand reports of market behaviour you have to bear in mind the way the market works.

A market is simply a mechanism, which allows individuals or organizations to trade with each other. Markets bring together buyers and sellers of goods and services. In some cases, such as a local fruit stall, buyers and sellers meet physically. In other cases, such as the stock market, business can be transacted over the telephone, almost by remote control. There's no need to go into these details. Instead, we use a general definition of markets.

A market is a shorthand expression for the process by which households' decisions about consumption of alternative goods, firms' decisions about what and how to produce, and workers' decisions about how much and for whom to work are all reconciled by adjustment of prices.

Prices of goods and of resources, such as labour, machinery and land, adjust to ensure that scarce resources are used to produce those goods and services that society demands.

Much of economics is devoted to the study of how markets and prices enable society to solve the problems of what, how and for whom to produce. Suppose you buy a hamburger for your lunch. What does this have to do with markets and prices? You chose the cafe because it was fast, convenient and cheap. Given your desire to eat, and your limited resources, the low hamburger price told you that this was a good way to satisfy your appetite. You probably prefer steak but that is more expensive. The price of steak is high enough to ensure that society answers the " for whom" question about lunchtime steaks in favour of someone

else.

Now think about the seller's viewpoint. The cafe owner is in business because, given the price of hamburger meat, the rent and the wages that must be paid, it is still possible to sell hamburgers at a profit. If rents were higher, it might be more profitable to sell hamburgers in a cheaper area or to switch to luxury lunches for rich executives on expense accounts. The student behind the counter is working there because it is a suitable part-time job, which pays a bit of money. If the wage were much lower it would hardly be worth working at all. Conversely, the job is unskilled and there are plenty of students looking for such work, so owners of cafes do not have to offer very high wages.

Prices are guiding your decision to buy a hamburger, the owner's decision to sell hamburgers, and the student's decision to take the job. Society is allocating resources – meat, buildings, and labour – into hamburger production through the price system. If nobody liked hamburgers, the owner could not sell enough at a price that covered the cost of running the cafe and society would devote no resources to hamburger production. People's desire to eat hamburgers guides resources into hamburger production. However, if cattle contracted a disease, thereby reducing the economy's ability to produce meat products, competition to purchase more scarce supplies of beef would bid up the price of beef, hamburger producers would be forced to raise prices, and consumers would buy more cheese sandwiches for lunch. Adjustments in prices would encourage society to reallocate resources to reflect the increased scarcity of cattle.

There were several markets involved in your purchase of a hamburger. You and the cafe owner were part of the market for lunches. The student behind the counter was part of the local labour market. The cafe owner was part of the local wholesale meat market and the local market for rented buildings. These descriptions of markets are not very precise. Were you part of the market for lunches, the market for prepared food or the market for sandwiches to which you would have turned if hamburgers had been more expensive? That is why we have adopted a very general definition of markets, which emphasizes that they are arrangements through, which prices influence the allocation of scarce resources.