Главная страница Случайная страница КАТЕГОРИИ: АвтомобилиАстрономияБиологияГеографияДом и садДругие языкиДругоеИнформатикаИсторияКультураЛитератураЛогикаМатематикаМедицинаМеталлургияМеханикаОбразованиеОхрана трудаПедагогикаПолитикаПравоПсихологияРелигияРиторикаСоциологияСпортСтроительствоТехнологияТуризмФизикаФилософияФинансыХимияЧерчениеЭкологияЭкономикаЭлектроника |
Глава 11. 186. Alberch, P. 1982a. Developmental constraints in evolutionary processes
186. Alberch, P. 1982a. Developmental constraints in evolutionary processes. In Evolution and Development, edited byj. T. Bonner. New York: Springer-Verlag. 187. Alberch, Pere. 1982b. The generative and regulatory roles of development in evolution. Edited by D. Mossakowsky and G. Roth, Environmental Adaptation and Evolution. Stuttgart and New York: Gustav Fischer. 188. Alberch, Pere, Stephen J. Gould, George F. Oster, and David B. Wake. 1979. Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 5: 296—317. 189. Glutton-Brock, J., G.B. Corbet, and M. Hills. 1976. A review of the family Canidae with a classification by numerical methods. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) (Zoology) 29: 117—99. 190. Coppinger, Raymond, and Lorna Coppinger. 1996. Biologic bases of behavior of domestic dog breeds. In Readings in Companion Animal Behavior, edited by V. Voith and P. Borchelt. Trenton, N.J.: Veterinary Learning Systems. 191. Godfrey, Laurie R., and Michael R. Sutherland. 1995. What's growth got to do with it? Process and product in the evolution of ontogeny. Journal of Human Evolution 29: 405—31. 192. Gould, Stephen Jay. 1966. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biological Review 41: 587—640. — 1986. The egg-a-day barrier. Natural History 86 (7). T6—24. 193. Haldane, J.В.S. 1930. The Causes of Evolution. London: Longmans Green. 194. Hildebrand, Milton. 1952. An analysis of body proportions in the Canidae. American Journal of Anatomy 90: 217—56. 195. Kruska, D. 1988. Mammalian domestication and its effects on brain structure and behaviour. In Intelligence and Evolutionary Biology, edited by H.J. Jerison and I. Jerison. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 196. Lumer, Hyman. 1940. Evolutionary allometry in the skeleton of the domestic dog. The American Naturalist 74: 439—67. 197. Martin, Robert D. 1996. Scaling of the mammalian brain: The maternal energy hypothesis. News in Physiological Sciences 11: 149—56. 198. Morey, Darcy F. 1992. Size, shape and development in the evolution of the domestic dog. Journal of Archeological Science 19: 181—284. 199. Northcutt, R.G. 1990. Ontogeny and phylogeny: A re-evaluation of conceptual relationships and some applications. Brain Behaviour and Evolution 36: 116—40. 200. Purves, Dale. 1988. Effects of animal size and form on the organization of the nervous system. In Body and Brain: A Trophic Theory of Neural Connections. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 201. Shea, Brian T. 1985. Ontogenetic allometry and scaling. In Size and Scaling in Primate Biology, edited by W.L. Jungers. New York: Plenum. 202. Stebbins, G. Ledyard, Jr. 1950. Variation and Evolution in Plants. New York: Columbia University Press. — 1959. The role of hybridization in evolution. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 103: 231—51. 203. Stockard, Charles R. 1941. The Genetic and Endocrinic Basis for Differences in Form and Behavior. Philadelphia: The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology. 204. Twitty, V.C. 1966. Of Scientists and Salamanders. San Francisco, Calif.: W.H. Freeman. 205. Wayne, Robert K. 1986. Cranial morphology of domestic and wild canids: The influence of development on morphological change. Evolution 40 (2): 243—61. 206. Willis, Malcolm B. 1991. The German Shepherd Dog: A Genetic History. London: H.F. and G. Witherby Ltd.
|