Главная страница Случайная страница


АвтомобилиАстрономияБиологияГеографияДом и садДругие языкиДругоеИнформатикаИсторияКультураЛитератураЛогикаМатематикаМедицинаМеталлургияМеханикаОбразованиеОхрана трудаПедагогикаПолитикаПравоПсихологияРелигияРиторикаСоциологияСпортСтроительствоТехнологияТуризмФизикаФилософияФинансыХимияЧерчениеЭкологияЭкономикаЭлектроника

Separation of powers and the democratic process


The early American way of life encouraged democracy. The colonists were inhabiting a land of forest and wilderness. They had to work together to build shelter, provide food, and clear the land for farms and dwellings. This need for cooperation strengthened the belief that, in the New World, people should be on an equal footing, with nobody having special privileges.


The urge for equality affected the original 13 colonies' relations with the mother country, England. The Declaration of Independence in 1776 proclaimed that all men are created equal, that all have the right to "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness."


The Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution after it, combined America's colonial experience with the political thought of such philosophers as England's John Locke to produce the concept of a democratic republic. The government would draw its power from the people themselves and exercise it through their elected representatives. During the Revolutionary War, the colonies had formed a national congress to present England with a united front. Under an agreement known as the Articles of Confederation, a postwar congress was allowed to handle only problems that were beyond the capabilities of individual states.




The Articles of Confederation failed as a governing document for the United States because the states did not cooperate as expected. When it came time to pay wages to the national army or the war debt to France, some states refused to contribute. To cure this weakness, the congress asked each state to send a delegate to a convention. The so-called Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia in May of 1787, with George Washington presiding.


The delegates struck a balance between those who wanted a strong central government and those who did not. The resulting master plan, or Constitution, set up a system in which some powers were given to the national, or federal, government, while others were reserved for the states. The Constitution divided the national government into three parts, or branches: the legislative (the Congress, which consists of a House of Representatives and a Senate), the executive (headed by the president), and the judicial (the federal courts). Called "separation of powers," this division gives each branch certain duties and substantial independence from the others. It also gives each branch some authority over the others through a system of "checks and balances."


Here are a few examples of how checks and balances work in practice.

•If Congress passes a proposed law, or "bill," that the president considers unwise, he can veto it. That means that the bill is dead unless two-thirds of the members of both the House and the Senate vote to enact it despite the president's veto.


•If Congress passes, and the president signs, a law that is challenged in the federal courts as contrary to the Constitution, the courts can nullify that law. (The federal courts cannot issue advisory or theoretical opinions, however; their jurisdiction is limited to actual disputes.)


•The president has the power to make treaties with other nations and to make appointments to federal positions, including judgeships. The Senate, however, must approve all treaties and confirm the appointments before they can go into effect.


Recently some observers have discerned what they see as a weakness in the tripartite system of government: a tendency toward too much checking and balancing that results in governmental stasis, or "gridlock."




The Constitution written in Philadelphia in 1787 could not go into effect until it was ratified by a majority of citizens in at least 9 of the then 13 U.S. states. During this ratification process, misgivings arose. Many citizens felt uneasy because the document failed to explicitly guarantee the rights of individuals. The desired language was added in 10 amendments to the Constitution, collectively known as the Bill of Rights.


The Bill of Rights guarantees Americans freedom of speech, of religion, and of the press. They have the right to assemble in public places, to protest government actions, and to demand change. There is a right to own firearms. Because of the Bill of Rights, neither police officers nor soldiers can stop and search a person without good reason. Nor can they search a person's home without permission from a court to do so. The Bill of Rights guarantees a speedy trial to anyone accused of a crime. The trial must be by jury if requested, and the accused person must be allowed representation by a lawyer and to call witnesses to speak for him or her. Cruel and unusual punishment is forbidden. With the addition of the Bill of Rights, the Constitution was ratified by all 13 states and went into effect in 1789.


Since then 17 other amendments have been added to the Constitution. Perhaps the most important of these are the Thirteenth and Fourteenth, which outlaw slavery and guarantee all citizens equal protection of the laws, and the Nineteenth, which gives women the right to vote.


The Constitution can be amended in either of two ways. Congress can propose an amendment, provided that two-thirds of the members of both the House and the Senate vote in favor of it. Or the legislatures of two-thirds of the states can call a convention to propose amendments. (This second method has never been used.) In either case a proposed amendment does not go into effect until ratified by three-fourths of the states.




The legislative branch -- the Congress -- is made up of elected representatives from each of the 50 states. It is the only branch of U.S. government that can make federal laws, levy federal taxes, declare war, and put foreign treaties into effect.


Members of the House of Representatives are elected to two-year terms. Each member represents a district in his or her home state. The number of districts is determined by a census, which is conducted every 10 years. The most populous states are allowed more representatives than the smaller ones, some of which have only one. In all, there are 435 representatives in the House.


Senators are elected to six-year terms. Each state has two senators, regardless of population. Senators' terms are staggered, so that one-third of the Senate stands for election every two years. There are 100 senators.


To become a law, a bill must pass both the House and the Senate. After the bill is introduced in either body, it is studied by one or more committees, amended, voted out of committee, and discussed in the chamber of the House or Senate. If passed by one body, it goes to the other for consideration. When a bill passes the House and the Senate in different forms, members of both bodies meet in a "conference committee" to iron out the differences. Groups that try to persuade members of Congress to vote for or against a bill are called "lobbies." They may try to exert their influence at almost any stage of the legislative process. Once both bodies have passed the same version of a bill, it goes to the president for approval.




The chief executive of the United States is the president, who together with the vice president is elected to a four-year term. As a result of a constitutional amendment that went into effect in 1951, a president may be elected to only two terms. Other than succeeding a president who dies or is disabled, the vice president's only official duty is presiding over the Senate. The vice president may vote in the Senate only to break a tie.


The president's powers are formidable but not unlimited. As the chief formulator of national policy, the president proposes legislation to Congress. As mentioned previously, the president may veto any bill passed by Congress. The president is commander-in-chief of the armed forces. The president has the authority to appoint federal judges as vacancies occur, including justices of the Supreme Court. As head of his political party, with ready access to the news media, the president can easily influence public opinion.


Within the executive branch, the president has broad powers to issue regulations and directives carrying out the work of the federal government's departments and agencies. The president appoints the heads and senior officials of those departments and agencies. Heads of the major departments, called "secretaries," are part of the president's cabinet. The majority of federal workers, however, are selected on the basis of merit, not politics.




The judicial branch is headed by the U.S. Supreme Court, which is the only court specifically created by the Constitution. In addition, Congress has established 13 federal courts of appeals and, below them, about 95 federal district courts. The Supreme Court meets in Washington, D.C., and the other federal courts are located in cities throughout the United States. Federal judges are appointed for life or until they retire voluntarily; they can be removed from office only via a laborious process of impeachment and trial in the Congress.


The federal courts hear cases arising out of the Constitution and federal laws and treaties, maritime cases, cases involving foreign citizens or governments, and cases in which the federal government is itself a party.


The Supreme Court consists of a chief justice and eight associate justices. With minor exceptions, cases come to the Supreme Court on appeal from lower federal or state courts. Most of these cases involve disputes over the interpretation and constitutionality of actions taken by the executive branch and of laws passed by Congress or the states (like federal laws, state laws must be consistent with the U.S. Constitution).




Although the three branches are said to be equal, often the Supreme Court has the last word on an issue. The courts can rule a law unconstitutional, which makes it void. Most such rulings are appealed to the Supreme Court, which is thus the final arbiter of what the Constitution means. Newspapers commonly print excerpts from the justices' opinions in important cases, and the Court's decisions are often the subject of public debate. This is as it should be: The decisions may settle longstanding controversies and can have social effects far beyond the immediate outcome. Two famous, related examples are Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954).


In Plessy the issue was whether blacks could be required to ride in separate railroad cars from whites. The Court articulated a "separate but equal" doctrine as its basis for upholding the practice. The case sent a signal that the Court was interpreting the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments narrowly and that a widespread network of laws and custom treating blacks and whites differently would not be disturbed. One justice, John Marshall Harlan, dissented from the decision, arguing that "the Constitution is color-blind."


Almost 60 years later the Court changed its mind. In Brown the court held that deliberately segregated public schools violated the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause. Although the Court did not directly overrule its Plessy decision, Justice Harlan's view of the Constitution was vindicated. The 1954 ruling applied directly only to schools in the city of Topeka, Kansas, but the principle it articulated reached every public school in the nation. More than that, the case undermined segregation in all governmental endeavors and set the nation on a new course of treating all citizens alike.


The Brown decision caused consternation among some citizens, particularly in the South, but was eventually accepted as the law of the land. Other controversial Supreme Court decisions have not received the same degree of acceptance. In several cases between 1962 and 1985, for example, the Court decided that requiring students to pray or listen to prayer in public schools violated the Constitution's prohibition against establishing a religion. Critics of these decisions believe that the absence of prayer in public schools has contributed to a decline in American morals; they have tried to find ways to restore prayer to the schools without violating the Constitution. In Roe v. Wade (1973), the Court guaranteed women the right to have abortions in certain circumstances -- a decision that continues to offend those Americans who consider abortion to be murder. Because the Roe v. Wade decision was based on an interpretation of the Constitution, opponents have been trying to amend the Constitution to overturn it.




Americans regularly exercise their democratic rights by voting in elections and by participating in political parties and election campaigns. Today, there are two major political parties in the United States, the Democratic and the Republican. The Democratic Party evolved from the party of Thomas Jefferson, formed before 1800. The Republican Party was established in the 1850s by Abraham Lincoln and others who opposed the expansion of slavery into new states then being admitted to the Union.


The Democratic Party is considered to be the more liberal party, and the Republican, the more conservative. Democrats generally believe that government has an obligation to provide social and economic programs for those who need them. Republicans are not necessarily opposed to such programs but believe they are too costly to taxpayers. Republicans put more emphasis on encouraging private enterprise in the belief that a strong private sector makes citizens less dependent on government.


Both major parties have supporters among a wide variety of Americans and embrace a wide range of political views. Members, and even elected officials, of one party do not necessarily agree with each other on every issue. Americans do not have to join a political party to vote or to be a candidate for public office, but running for office without the money and campaign workers a party can provide is difficult.


Minor political parties -- generally referred to as "third parties" -- occasionally form in the United States, but their candidates are rarely elected to office. Minor parties often serve, however, to call attention to an issue that is of concern to voters, but has been neglected in the political dialogue. When this happens, one or both of the major parties may address the matter, and the third party disappears.


At the national level, elections are held every two years, in even-numbered years, on the first Tuesday following the first Monday in November. State and local elections often coincide with national elections, but they also are held in other years and can take place at other times of year.

Americans are free to determine how much or how little they become involved in the political process. Many citizens actively participate by working as volunteers for a candidate, by promoting a particular cause, or by running for office themselves. Others restrict their participation to voting on election day, quietly letting their democratic system work, confident that their freedoms are protected.


encourage [In'kArIdZ] v поощрять, поддерживать

shelter ['Seltq] n кров, пристанище, приют, убежище

strengthen ['streNT(q)n, 'strenT(q)n] v усиливать, укреплять, делать более сильным, крепким, прочным и пр.

to be on a/one, an equal/ footing — а) быть на равной ноге; 6) находиться в равных условиях

urge [E:dZ] n побуждение, побудительный мотив

affect [q'fekt] v (воздействовать (на что-л.); влиять

proclaim [prq'kleIm] v объявлять; провозглашать

pursuit [pq'sju:t] n поиски; стремление; домогательство

concept ['kPnsept] n понятие, идея, общее представление; концепция

handle ['hxndl] v трактовать; разбирать, обсуждать

beyond [bI'jPnd] adv вне, за пределами



to pay wages — платить заработную ппату

debt [det] n долг, долговое обязательство; задолженность

strike [straik] v (struck; struck, stricken) поражать; сражать

duty ['dju:tI] n долг, моральное обязательство; функция, обязанность

to take up /to enter upon/ one's duties — приступить к исполнению своих обязанностей

substantial[sqb'stxnS(q)l] a существенный, важный, значительный, большой

checks and balances — амер. система «сдержек и противовесов”, принцип взаимоограничения властей (законодательной, исполнительной и судебной)

unwise [An'waIz] a неблагоразумный, неумный, глупый

veto ['vi:tqV] v налагать вето (на что-л.)

to veto the bill [a draft resolution] — наложить вето на законопроект [на проект резолюции]

enact [I'nxkt] v принимать, вводить в действие (закон)

the president enacted the bill — президент подписал /утвердил/ закон

the bill was enacted into law — законопроект стал законом

challenge ['tSxlIndZ] v оспаривать, подвергать сомнению

nullify ['nAlIfaI] v юр. отменять, делать недействительным

advjsory [qd'vaIz(q)rI] а совещательный; консультативный

judgeship n ['dZAdZSIp] судейская должность

discern [dI'sE:n] v разглядеть, (у)видеть; заметить

tripartite [traI'pQ:taIt] a трёхсторонний, тройственный; состоящий из трёх частей

stasis ['steIsIs] n (pl -ses) мед. Застой, статическое равновесие



misgiving ["mIs'gIvIN] n опасение, предчувствие дурного

arise [q'raIz] v (arose; arisen) возникать, появляться

doubts [difficulties] arose — появились сомнения [трудности]

fire-arm ['faI(q)rQ:m] n обыкн. pl огнестрельное оружие

trial ['traIql] n (судебное) следствие; судебное разбирательство; суд; слушание дела

trial by jury — слушание дела в суде присяжных

trial by court martial — военный суд, трибунал

reopening of the trial — возобновление дела по вновь открывшимся обстоятельствам

to stand (one's) trial, to come up for one's trial — находиться под судом; предстать перед судом

to put smb. to /on/ trial, to bring up smb. for /to/ trial — привлекать кого-л. к суду

accuse [q'kju:z] v юр. обвинять (кого-л.); выдвинуть обвинение (против кого-л.)

to accuse smb. of a crime — обвинить кого-л. в преступлении

jury ['dZV(q)rI] n присяжные (заседатели); суд присяжных

request [rI'kwest] предлагать, предписывать

accused [q'kju:zd] a юр. обвиняемый (в преступлении)

lawyer ['lO:jq] n юрист; адвокат

witness ['wItnIs] n свидетель, очевидец, свидетель (особ. в суде)

to call as a witness — вызывать в качестве свидетеля

to call to witness — призывать в свидетели

to come into effect /force/ — вступать в силу

outlaw ['aVtlO:] v изгонять за пределы страны; объявлять вне закона; лишать законной силы

protection [prq'tekS(q)n] n защита, охрана, предохранение; ограждение, прикрытие

provided [prq'vaIdId] cj (часто provided that) при условии (что), если только, в том случае если

legislature ['ledZIs|leItSq, -lqtSq] n законодательный орган; законодательная власть



levy ['levI] v собирать, взимать (налоги и т п.), облагать (налогом и т п), налагать

district ['dIstrIkt] n округ, район; участок; дистрикт

determine [dI'tE:mIn] v определять, устанавливать

census ['sensqs] n перепись (населения; тж. population census, census of population)

conduct [kqn'dAkt] v вести

, руководить; проводить

senator ['senqtq] n сенатор

chamber ['tSeImbq] n палата (парламента)

senate chamber — зал заседаний сената

Lower [Upper] Chamber — нижняя [верхняя] палата

iron out ['aIqn'aVt] phr v устранять; сглаживать (трудности, разногласия)

persuade [pq'sweId] v убеждать; склонять, уговаривать

lobby ['lPbI] n кулуары (законодательного собрания); собир. лобби, завсегдатаи кулуаров

exert [Ig'zE:t] v проявлять

influence ['InflVqns] n влияние, воздействие



Chief Executive ["ti:fIg'zekjVtIv] амер. президент; глава исполнительной власти (титул президента США); губернатор штата; глава корпорации, фирмы и т. п.

other ['ADq] adv (обыкн. в сочетании с than) иначе, по-другому

succeed [sqk'si:d] v достигнуть цели, суметь сделать (что-л.); приходить на смену (чему-л.)

disabte [dIs'eIbl] v делать неспособным или непригодным; приводить, в негодность; выводить из строя, калечить

preside [prI'zaId] v председательствовать

tie [taI] n равное число голосов (избирателей); игра вничью; состязание, в котором соперники приходят к финишу одновременно

formidabte ['fO:mId|qb(q)l, fq'mId-] a огромный, внушительный

commander-in-chief [kq"mQ:nd(q)r|In'tSi:f] n (главно)командующий

armed forces ["Q:md'fO:sIz] вооружённые силы (страны)

appoint [q'pOInt] v назначать (на пост); утверждать (в должности)

to appoint smb. ambassador [head-master] — назначать кого-л. послом [директором школы]

to appoint smb. to a post — назначать кого-л. на пост /на должность/

judge [dZAdZ] n судья

vacancy ['veIkqnsI] n вакансия, незанятая должность, незанятое рабочее место

occur [q'kE:] v случаться, происходить

justice ['dZAstIs] n судья, правосудие, юстиция

Court of Justice — суд

Department of Justice — министерство юстиции (в США)

Chief Justice — амер. председатель суда; председательствующий на судебном заседании

access ['xkses] n доступ

agency ['eIdZ(q)nsI] n агентство, представительство, орган, организация, учреждение

merit ['merIt] n заслуга, достоинство



Court of Арреаl— Апелляционный суд

district-court ['dIstrIkt'kO:t] n окружной суд; первая инстанция Федерального суда по гражданским делам (в США)

supreme court [s(j)u:"pri:m'kO:t] верховный суд (страны)

voluntarily ['vPlqnt(q)rIlI] adv добровольно; по своему (собственному) желанию или выбору

via ['vaIq] prep через, путем, через посредство

laborious [lq'bO:rIqs] a трудный, трудоемкий, утомительный

nothing arises out of his statement — из его заявления ничего не вытекает

maritime ['mxrItaIm] a морской

exception [Ik'sepS(q)n] n исключение, изъятие

case [keIs] n судебное дело

consistent [kqn'sIst(q)nt] a (with) совместимый, сообразный, согласующийся



court of last resort — последняя судебная инстанция, суд последней инстанции

rule [ru:l] v управлять, править, властвовать, юр разрешать (дело), постановлять

arbiter ['Q:bItq] n третейский судья, арбитр, (верховный) судья

excerpt ['eksE:pt] n отрывок, выдержка, выписка

longstanding ["lPN'stxndIN] a длительный, продолжительный

controversy ['kPntrqvE:sI, kqn'trPvqsI] n спор, дискуссия, полемика

immediate [I'mi:dIqt] a непосредственный, прямой

outcome ['aVtkAm] n результат, последствие, исход

articutate [Q:'tIkjVlIt] v ясно выражать, формулировать

disturb [dIs'tE:b] v юр. мешать беспрепятственному использованию права

dissent [dI'sent] v (from) расходиться во мнениях, не соглашаться; возражать

to dissent from smb.'s opinion — выражать несогласие /не соглашаться/ с чьим-л. мнением; разойтись с кем-л. во взглядах по какому-л. вопросу

deliberately [dI'lIb(q)rItlI] adv преднамеренно, умышленно, сознательно, нарочно

clause [klO:z] n статья, пункт, условие, оговорка (договора, контракта, завещания)

under clause 5 of the agreement — согласно статье 5 соглашения

overrule ["qVvq'ru:l] v отвергать, отклонять предложение, аннулировать; считать недействительным

to overrule a claim [an objection] — отвергать требование [возражение]

to overrule a decision — считать недействительным /отменить/ решение

vindicate ['vIndIkeIt] v доказать; подтвердить; отстаивать, защищать; поддерживать

ruling ['ru:lIN] n постановление, решение (суда, председателя собрания)

undermine ["Andq'maIn] v подрывать, расшатывать

endeavour [In'devq] n (энергичная) попытка, старание, усилие

consternation ["kPnstq'neIS(q)n] n ужас, испуг; оцепенение (от страха)

eventually [I'ventSV(q)lI] adv в конечном счёте, в итоге, в конце концов

pray pray [preI] v молиться

violate ['vaIqleIt] v нарушать, преступать; попирать

to violate the law — нарушать или попирать закон

to violate an oath — нарушить /преступить/ присягу

prohibition ["prqVhI'bIS(q)n] n запрещение; запрет, юр. запретительный судебный приказ

moral ['mPrql] n мораль, поучение; pl нравы; нравственность; нравственный облик

certain ['sE:tn] а некоторый, определённый; известный

circumstance ['sE:kqmstxns, 'sE:kqmstqns] n pl обстоятельства, условия, положение дел

in /under/ the circumstances — при данных обстоятельствах; в этих условиях; в таком случае

offend [q'fend] v обижатъ, оскорблять

murder ['mE:dq] n (умышленное, преднамеренное) убийство

amend [q'mend] v исправлять, улучшать, изменять к лучшему

overturn ['qVvqtE:n] v свергать, уничтожать



exercise ['eksqsaIz] v осуществлять, применять, использовать; пользоваться; проявлять

evolve [I'vPlv] v развиваться, эволюционировать

obligation ["PblI'geIS(q)n] n обязанность; долг, обязательство

embrace [Im'breIs] v включать; заключать в себе

run for partiament [for office, for president] — баллотироваться в парламент (на (какую-л ) должность, на пост президента

refer [rI'fE:] v (обыкн. to) упоминать (что-л., кого-л.); говорить (о чём-л., ком-л.); намекать

in cases referred to above — и случаях, указанных выше

disappear ["dIsq'pIq] v исчезать, скрываться

even number — чётное число

coincide ["kqVIn'saId] v совпадать

restrict [rI'strIkt] v ограничивать

confident ['kPnfId(q)nt] a уверенный


mylektsii.su - Мои Лекции - 2015-2020 год. (0.064 сек.)Все материалы представленные на сайте исключительно с целью ознакомления читателями и не преследуют коммерческих целей или нарушение авторских прав Пожаловаться на материал