Студопедия

Главная страница Случайная страница

КАТЕГОРИИ:

АвтомобилиАстрономияБиологияГеографияДом и садДругие языкиДругоеИнформатикаИсторияКультураЛитератураЛогикаМатематикаМедицинаМеталлургияМеханикаОбразованиеОхрана трудаПедагогикаПолитикаПравоПсихологияРелигияРиторикаСоциологияСпортСтроительствоТехнологияТуризмФизикаФилософияФинансыХимияЧерчениеЭкологияЭкономикаЭлектроника






Hierarchical Distribution of Syntactic Level Unit






 

Syntactic units Word-Groups Sentences Supersyntactic Units
  Types of Syntactic Connection Structural Types Types of Interconnection
Language Co-ordinate Subordinate Primary Predication Word-Groups Secondary Predication Word-Groups Simple Composite Intermediary between Simple and Composite Parallel Connection Catenated Connection Mixed-Type Connection
English + + + + + + + + + +
Ukrainian + + + ± + + + + + +

This is marked in the given table (in the word-group) by the ± sign which testifies to the existence of secondary predication word-group as well as of some syntactically isomorphic intermediaries between simple and composite sentences both in English and in present-day Ukrainian. As can be seen in the table, several deep structure syntactic phenomena are also common in both contrasted languages. These are: 1) co-ordination, subordination and predication; 2) the existence of predominantly common structural types of higher syntactic level units and partly common ways and means of their connection at the syntactic level in the contrasted languages and 3) the existences within the framework of English and Ukrainian supersyntactic speech units.

Hence the most general summery/conclusion:

1. Any contrastive typological investigation aims at establishing iso morphism and allomorphism in the systems of lingual phenomena and the characteristic features pertained to them in the contrasted languages.

2. The main aim of aspect and charactereological typologies is to establish isomorphism and allomorphism in the structural forms of the investigated language units and in the ways and means of connecting their componental parts as well as the means and ways of expressing


their sense/meaning in the contrasted languages.

3. Aspective and charactereological typologies, as could be seen, also aim at establishing the quantitative and qualitative correlation between the isomorphic and allomorphic features and phenomena in the contrast ed languages under investigation.

4. Typologically relevant for the establishment of isomorphic traits in genealogically different languages can also be a contrastive historical approach to some lingual facts within a single language aspect of the contrasted languages. The existence of such facts, as in case of Ukrai nian and Sanskrit, speak in favour of the establishment of a new linguistic subject of historical contrastive typology.


Поделиться с друзьями:

mylektsii.su - Мои Лекции - 2015-2024 год. (0.006 сек.)Все материалы представленные на сайте исключительно с целью ознакомления читателями и не преследуют коммерческих целей или нарушение авторских прав Пожаловаться на материал